Re: Tradeoffs of XML encoding by enclosing all content in CDAT
2008/9/30 Henry S. Thompson <ht@i...>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I seem to be in the minority, but I think using CDATA-sections is > entirely reasonable when inserting large amounts of textual material > in an XML document. Note I said 'textual material' -- this _does_ > often contain ampersands, but close-enought-to-never contains the > catastrophic ]]>. The same observation does _not_, of course, apply > to large amounts of binary data. Isn't the point though, that you can insert large amounts of "textual material" into the in-memory version of the XML as a text node and then let the serializer deal with it as normal. It's only when you insert that textual material into the serlized form of the XML that you need to worry about using a cdata section... That's right isn't it? -- Andrew Welch http://andrewjwelch.com Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format