• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• To: "'bryan rasmussen'" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>,"'Robin Berjon'" <robin@j...>
• Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:45:28 -0000

> But because starting with xml is reserved that 
> implies that xmlns has a W3C determined meaning.

Something wrong with your logic there. All names starting with xml are
reserved but nearly all such names have no W3C determined meaning.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>

• References:
  • Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
    • From: Matthew Van Gundy <matt-xmldev@s...>
  • RE: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Re: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • Re: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin@j...>
  • Re: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
    • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>