• From: richard@i... (Richard Tobin)
• To: xml-dev@l...
• Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:23:09 +0000 (GMT)

In article <9C4AFAA5-8048-4065-93DF-6ED37F94353A@j...> you write:

>Any casing of "xml" being reserved isn't necessarily namespaces  
>related, it also allows the introduction of future features with  
>specific semantics (as happened with the belated xml:id).

xml:id does use "xml" as the (automatically-bound) namespace prefix.
But there's also <?xml-stylesheet?> which doesn't use namespace
syntax because PI names aren't namespaced.

-- Richard

• References:
  • Re: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
    • From: Robin Berjon <robin@j...>