[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Element equivalence under XML Namespaces

  • From: "bryan rasmussen" <rasmussen.bryan@g...>
  • To: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:40:18 +0100

Re:  Element equivalence under XML Namespaces
> No, it's not. Well-formedness is defined in the XML specification, and this
> doesn't know anything about namespaces;

Not exactly, it knows some things about Namespaces but not enough to
specify semantic matching - I think it's sort of weird that. Things
that it knows that I can remember:

1. : should be used in definition of namespaces.

2. XML or xml is reserved. I don't think xmlns is defined as a
namespace declaration anywhere but it seems sort of implied.


Bryan Rasmussen

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index]


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.