[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with leg

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better..
• From: Tei <oscar.vives@g...>
• Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 14:18:49 +0200
• Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uHs/lj1uBuJ2mMylKMOS5SBTm8StFbDdrTN0+I/G4uSGpmt07a+OnDjlJGUGNT6FOj4j0dBg4As0PpwpN448Ao7dUaoE4OFUzOBxkzPxNFxR5Y/YCAiOv6RG+nG/Rcat015Qb0lr47eEEOknyFarWCLLDhM7DM9RUPn1R5K+f5Q=
• In-reply-to: <44C4ABB4.2070202@a...>
• References: <44C2A214.2010903@a...> <001a01c6ade2$374c4fc0$6401a8c0@turtle> <7.0.1.0.0.20060723100223.03e64260@c...> <1153684981.30211.276.camel@l...> <7.0.1.0.0.20060723223938.03e6b6e0@c...> <1153693413.30211.289.camel@l...> <7.0.1.0.0.20060723233604.02212b20@c...> <1153706409.30211.325.camel@l...> <44C4ABB4.2070202@a...>

On 7/24/06, Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...> wrote:
> David Lyon wrote:
> >
> > <Item Information>
> >  PLU&="A256" Name&="Kitchen Veneer" Rate$~=HD321_C
> > </Item Information>
> >
> > decrypted it would read..
> >
> > <Item Information>
> >  PLU&="A256" Name&="Kitchen Veneer" Rate$=402.00
> > </Item Information>
> >
> There is nothing stopping you doing this in real XML,  just moving the
> type tag inside the attribute value. For example (off the top of my
> head, details may be wrong):
>
>     <Item Information PLU="A256" Name="Kitchen Veneer" Rate="$420"/>
>

This make easy to get data from javascript with dom:

var rate = xitem.getAttribute("Rate");

..and maybe he can have that:

 <Item Information id="REF-A256" PLU="A256" Name="Kitchen Veneer" Rate="$420"/>

var xitem =  xmlDoc.getElementById("REF-A256");
var rate = xitem.getAttribute("Rate");

And the whole doc can be:

<?xml...
<sales>
   <item ...
   <item ...
   <item ...
   <item ...
   <item ...
   <item ...
</sales>


JSON can beat that, maybe:

var rate = sales.items["REF-A256"].rate;

• References:
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@a...>
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@p...>
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>
  • Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacysupport.. carries business data better..
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@p...>
  • Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better..
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>
  • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better..
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@p...>
  • Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something withlegacy support.. carries business data better..
    • From: Rick Jelliffe <rjelliffe@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML Versioning
• Next by Date: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better..
• Next by thread: Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. something with legacy support.. carries business data better..
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread