Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 22:43 +0100, peter murray-rust wrote: > >Of course, I'm sure that with your skill-set and influence, you would be > >able to pull off anything that you set your mind to and convince > >whatever parties you see beneficial to come to the table. > > More modestly and realistically if 5% of this list come to a common > viewpoint here and are motivated to create a spec or realizable white > paper then we will have made a step forward. What seems to be very clear is that there are a range of target audiences for xml. Everybody has different coloured glasses. I truly only thought xml was designed to carry business data. But then again that is all that I use it for. But on day one, you learn that if you try to send a '10" Spanner' it will get stuck in the works and the whole thing will come to a grinding halt. That is until you spend another day on a mailing list learning about the " thing. We need a list of 5 or ten things that need to be fixed or targeted. My #1 is more transperently and easily carry business data. Regards David
|
