• To: "'Mitch Amiano'" <mitch.amiano@a...>,"'Didier PH Martin'" <martind@n...>
• Subject: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 23:57:32 +0100
• Cc: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <44C2A214.2010903@a...>
• Thread-index: Acat24xNLjG22p2FSL+FX5QQdXJG/QABhX4g

> IMHO, when the idea of XML + XSLT was first stirred up, I 
> think there was a window of time in which the idea could be 
> rapidly adopted, or pushed to the side. Inconsistencies and 
> defectiveness of the browser support meant it was pushed the side.

Since about 1993 there has never been a window of time in which new
technologies could be rapidly adopted client-side; it has always been
necessary to wait a few years until a significant proportion of the
installed base of browsers supported the technology in question.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: peter murray-rust <pm286@c...>
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@p...>
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@a...>

• References:
  • Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
    • From: Mitch Amiano <mitch.amiano@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Next by Date: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Previous by thread: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Next by thread: Re: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread