• To: 'Michael Kay' <mike@s...>,'Mitch Amiano' <mitch.amiano@a...>
• Subject: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• From: Didier PH Martin <martind@n...>
• Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 09:09:58 -0400
• Cc: "'Costello, Roger L.'" <costello@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <001a01c6ade2$374c4fc0$6401a8c0@turtle>

Hello Michael,

Michael said:
Since about 1993 there has never been a window of time in which new
technologies could be rapidly adopted client-side; it has always been
necessary to wait a few years until a significant proportion of the
installed base of browsers supported the technology in question.

Didier replies:
Or that a re-branding effort occurs. Just to mention the AJAX re-branding of
DHTML or any other name people gave to scripting client side. What made AJAX
a successful re-branding was the addition of a missing piece to the
equation: the capacity to communicate with the server in the context of a
current document (without the need to reload a new document). I personally
think that re-branding XSLT will also need a missing piece: complete two way
data marshalling with RDB. When (if we ever get this) this will be
available, the trick will be to invent a new brand, re-brand the toolset, do
some examples and let the PR engine do its work....

Cheers
Didier PH Martin

• References:
  • RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the 'visible Web'?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Next by Date: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Previous by thread: Re: Re: Identifying the Top 10 xml Issues.. somethingwith legacy support.. carries business data better..
• Next by thread: RE: [SUMMARY #1] Why is there little usage of XML on the'visible Web'?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread