|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Expe
On jeu, 2005-07-14 at 11:54 -0400, Elliotte Harold wrote: > regardless, mixed content is not as uncommon or unexpected as many > people think. It is not an accident. It is not bad form. It is not > something to be avoided. It is the very natural way to express many > extremely common constructs when modeling information, including > so-called data-oriented applications (as if any information content were > not data). Well said! Unfortunately, most people tend to exclude any mixed content from data-oriented applications and the grammar based schema languages (including RELAX NG) include restrictions that makes it impossible to restrict the values of the text nodes in mixed content (that's what I have tried to explain in my RNG book: http://books.xmlschemata.org/relaxng/relax-CHP-7-SECT-10.html). It's a chicken/eggs problem: because data heads don't like mixed content, their toolbox doesn't support it properly and because their toolbox doesn't support it properly, they don't like mixed content... Eric -- Carnet web : http://eric.van-der-vlist.com/blog?t=category&a=Fran%C3%A7ais ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist http://xmlfr.org http://dyomedea.com (ISO) RELAX NG ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax (W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema ------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Cast Your Vote
We need your help – Vote for DataDirect XML Products!
Winners and finalists announced at SOA World Conference in November. Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||







