[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExp

• To: Pete Cordell <petexmldev@t...>
• Subject: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
• From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 11:22:31 -0400
• Cc: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <001e01c58886$c0b15710$b700a8c0@RW>
• References: <e3a5cb2c05070610191ecca85c@m...> <4921.203.164.53.84.1120931469.squirrel@i...> <1326.203.164.53.84.1120936529.squirrel@i...> <e3a5cb2c05071110226e653f6c@m...> <42D34364.9000401@r...> <e3a5cb2c0507112205283be4d4@m...> <6085538505297f41ab697399a42ca403@w...> <2401.203.164.53.150.1121313738.squirrel@i...> <7e2390be355000ab65b4d18c7758131a@w...> <42D66D5E.6040300@m...> <001e01c58886$c0b15710$b700a8c0@RW>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Macintosh/20050317)

Pete Cordell wrote:

> Mixed is a core feature that XML supports, but does that mean you have 
> to make use of it as a core feature for an application specific XML 
> syntax specification language (e.g. a data oriented schema profile)?

Yes. Failure to fully support the XML infoset would be a disaster for 
any schema language. No particular schema has to use it, but it has to 
be recognized and supported, if for no other reason than to identify it 
as invalid when documents do contain mixed content.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@m...
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>

• References:
  • Schema Experience Workshop minutes online
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Can Blind Freddy see a pattern here? (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re:
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by Date: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Previous by thread: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by thread: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread