|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Ex
Original Message From: "Elliotte Harold" > Paul Downey wrote: > >> Which I think, proves my point. Whilst I agree that mixed content is >> core - from my perspective it's what XML is all about, but for many >> people serialising their data, it's a nuisance and definitely not as >> core as xsi:nill. > > The difference is that mixed content is core part of XML itself. xsi:nil > is only relevant in the context of one particular schema language. > Mixed is a core feature that XML supports, but does that mean you have to make use of it as a core feature for an application specific XML syntax specification language (e.g. a data oriented schema profile)? Pete. -- ============================================= Pete Cordell Tech-Know-Ware Ltd ----------------------------------------------------------------- for XML to C++ data binding visit http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx (or http://www.xml2cpp.com) =============================================
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Cast Your Vote
We need your help – Vote for DataDirect XML Products!
Winners and finalists announced at SOA World Conference in November. Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||







