[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Ex

• To: "Elliotte Harold" <elharo@m...>,"Paul Downey" <paul.downey@w...>
• Subject: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• From: "Pete Cordell" <petexmldev@t...>
• Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:14:27 +0100
• Cc: <xml-dev@l...>
• References: <e3a5cb2c05070610191ecca85c@m...> <4921.203.164.53.84.1120931469.squirrel@i...> <1326.203.164.53.84.1120936529.squirrel@i...> <e3a5cb2c05071110226e653f6c@m...> <42D34364.9000401@r...> <e3a5cb2c0507112205283be4d4@m...> <6085538505297f41ab697399a42ca403@w...> <2401.203.164.53.150.1121313738.squirrel@i...> <7e2390be355000ab65b4d18c7758131a@w...> <42D66D5E.6040300@m...>

Original Message From: "Elliotte Harold"
> Paul Downey wrote:
>
>> Which I think, proves my point. Whilst I agree that mixed content is
>> core - from my perspective it's what XML is all about, but for many
>> people serialising their data, it's a nuisance and definitely not as
>> core as xsi:nill.
>
> The difference is that mixed content is  core part of XML itself. xsi:nil 
> is only relevant in the context of one particular schema language.
>

Mixed is a core feature that XML supports, but does that mean you have to 
make use of it as a core feature for an application specific XML syntax 
specification language (e.g. a data oriented schema profile)?

Pete.
--
=============================================
Pete Cordell
Tech-Know-Ware Ltd
-----------------------------------------------------------------
                         for XML to C++ data binding visit
                         http://www.tech-know-ware.com/lmx
                         (or http://www.xml2cpp.com)
=============================================

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• References:
  • Schema Experience Workshop minutes online
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Can Blind Freddy see a pattern here? (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Ronald Bourret <rpbourret@r...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re:
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
  • Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
    • From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by Date: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
• Previous by thread: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: Schema Experience Workshop minutes online)
• Next by thread: Re: Interesting pair of comments (was Re: SchemaExperience Workshop minutes online)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread