• To: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>
• Subject: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
• From: Bob Foster <bob@o...>
• Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:44:39 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...,"William J. Kammerer" <wkammerer@n...>
• In-reply-to: <200503041246.09177.david.lyon@c...>
• References: <032801c52058$628a0330$c970fea9@CMHNovannet> <200503041246.09177.david.lyon@c...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217

David Lyon wrote:

> imo that's an ugly character, the  "¬" symbol. Even uglier than
> my "Ya" text.... :-)
> 
> Given the following:
> 
>  a) <SomeChick>
>       really_ugly?=True
>     </SomeChick>
> 
> or
> 
>  a) <SomeChick>
>       really_ugly?=¬
>     </SomeChick>

No, sorry. Yours is uglier.

Bob Foster

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• References:
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: "William J. Kammerer" <wkammerer@n...>
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by Date: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread