• To: "'David Lyon'" <david.lyon@c...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• From: "Michael Kay" <mike@s...>
• Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 09:56:11 -0000
• Cc: "'William J. Kammerer'" <wkammerer@n...>
• In-reply-to: <200503041246.09177.david.lyon@c...>
• Thread-index: AcUgWr9i8a+kKQZ8QC6pjrrui7pbPAARQLiA

> imo that's an ugly character, the  "¬" symbol. 

Hey, that's a good way to keep the size of Unicode down. We'll only allow
characters that no-one thinks are ugly.

Michael Kay
http://www.saxonica.com/

• References:
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missingfrom the UCS ?
• Next by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread