• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• From: "William J. Kammerer" <wkammerer@n...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:20:34 -0500
• Organization: Novannet, LLC. Columbus, US-OH

Is this a trick question?  The logical NOT sign is NOT missing.  I
assume you mean the  "¬" symbol. It can't be missing from Unicode -
otherwise I couldn't have placed it in this e-mail using ordinary ISO
8879-1 (a.k.a. Latin-1).  It's x00AC (or "U+00AC").

William J. Kammerer
Novannet
Columbus, OH 43221-3859 . USA
+1 (614) 487-0320

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Collin Hsu" <collin@w...>
To: <xml-dev@l...>
Sent: Thursday, 03 March, 2005 01:52 PM
Subject:  [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing
from the UCS ?


I find out that most math symbols can be found in the UCS, including
LOGICAL AND and LOGICAL OR.

However, LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS.

It's really unconvenient.

Does anybody know the reason? Thanks !

Cheers,
Collin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
    • From: David Lyon <david.lyon@c...>

• Prev by Date: Do I need XML parser ?
• Next by Date: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Previous by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread