• To: collin@w...
• Subject: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• From: David Carlisle <davidc@n...>
• Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:18:09 GMT
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200503031853.SAA05513@n...> (collin@w...)
• References: <200503031853.SAA05513@n...>

character 172: NOT SIGN

David

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk
________________________________________________________________________

• Prev by Date: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Next by Date: Do I need XML parser ?
• Previous by thread: rddl editing
• Next by thread: Re: [About Unicode] Why the symbol LOGICAL NOT is missing from the UCS ?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread