[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblog items?

• To: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
• Subject: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• From: david.lyon@c...
• Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 09:55:48 +1100
• Cc: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <41AE0DF9.4050303@w...>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206986@h...> <e3a5cb2c041130160773c70e4c@m...> <1101862558.41ad169edbc14@65.39.203.11> <41AE0DF9.4050303@w...>
• User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.6

Paul,

Interesting. at least in perl it's a respectable language.

Don't seem to mind the idea of parsing stuff in perl.

but this:

     http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue87/ramankutty.html

that looks like a lake of fire...

I guess if I am a bad programmer that is where I'll be
going in the next life.......

David

Quoting Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>:

> david.lyon@c... wrote:
>
> > only funny because I remember YACC from way back. No
> > doubt it still exists. I remember that was one
> > heck of a frustrating program.
>
> oh it still exists, though i've moved onto using Parse::RecDescent
> as a better mouse trap for writing ad-hoc parsers:
> http://search.cpan.org/~dconway/Parse-RecDescent-1.94/lib/Parse/RecDescent.pod
>
> > and yet... some of these new tools have exactly the
> > same frustration level in xml even now. I don't know
> > why I think that, but it seems that way to me. Especially
> > in Linux.
>
> i guess it might be interesting to compare the shift-reduce
> limitations of YACC with, say the UPA rule in W3C schema:
> http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue87/ramankutty.html
>
>
> --
> Paul Downey
> http://blog.whatfettle.com
>
>




----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

• References:
  • Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblogitems?)
    • From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Next by Date: Re: Ontolgies, Mappings and Transformations (was RE: Web Services/SOA)
• Previous by thread: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblogitems?)
• Next by thread: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread