[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblogitems?)

• To: david.lyon@c...
• Subject: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblogitems?)
• From: Paul Downey <paul.downey@w...>
• Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 18:31:21 +0000
• Cc: Michael Champion <michaelc.champion@g...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <1101862558.41ad169edbc14@65.39.203.11>
• References: <15725CF6AFE2F34DB8A5B4770B7334EE07206986@h...> <e3a5cb2c041130160773c70e4c@m...> <1101862558.41ad169edbc14@65.39.203.11>
• User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103)

david.lyon@c... wrote:

> only funny because I remember YACC from way back. No
> doubt it still exists. I remember that was one
> heck of a frustrating program.

oh it still exists, though i've moved onto using Parse::RecDescent
as a better mouse trap for writing ad-hoc parsers:
http://search.cpan.org/~dconway/Parse-RecDescent-1.94/lib/Parse/RecDescent.pod

> and yet... some of these new tools have exactly the
> same frustration level in xml even now. I don't know
> why I think that, but it seems that way to me. Especially
> in Linux.

i guess it might be interesting to compare the shift-reduce
limitations of YACC with, say the UPA rule in W3C schema:
http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue87/ramankutty.html


-- 
Paul Downey
http://blog.whatfettle.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblog items?)
    • From: david.lyon@c...

• Prev by Date: Re: Ontolgies, Mappings and Transformations (was RE: Web Services/SOA)
• Next by Date: Re: Ontolgies, Mappings and Transformations (was RE: Web Services/SOA)
• Previous by thread: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Next by thread: Re: Web Services/SOA (was RE: XML 2004 weblog items?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread