Re: RDDL(2): new version up
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 18:32, Eric van der Vlist wrote: <snip> > > I am surprised to see that "not using XLink" seems now to be considered > as a benefit by itself. > > A while ago, XLink was to be the technology that would save the web and > now it has become evil because that has not be the case. > > Why not just take it for what it is: a spec with a domain of application > that can be useful in its domain (and I think that it's the case for > RDDL) and useless in other domains (as for any specification)? I have a bit of trouble understanding why XLink hasn't cought on. As W3C recommendations go, it is one of the more useful. XLinks are no more difficult to implement than the other linking solutions that litter W3C recommendations, and XLinks have the benefit of offering standardized and link processing and the promise of reusable link processing software. /Henrik Mårtensson
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format