[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDDL(2): new version up

• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 08:34:23 -0800
• References: <0494A708-49EF-11D8-B62D-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <1074458181.24853.364.camel@delleric> <8CDD5CB2-4A08-11D8-81B2-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <p06010206bc31a291caf6@[192.168.254.4]>

Does anyone know the current deployment/penetration level of RDDL? I know
that I am using it for all of my major projects-- basically whenever
anything goes public it has an RDDL document at the end of the namespace. I
ask because I am curious what the cost is to upgrade. Additionally there was
a lot of talk in the beginning about SAX Filters and the like that could try
to automate RDDL lookups-- are any of those still out there?


Cheers,
Jeff Rafter

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: XML Training
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread