[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: RDDL(2): new version up

• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
• Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 18:09:25 +0100
• In-reply-to: <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>
• Organization: Dyomedea (http://dyomedea.com)
• References: <0494A708-49EF-11D8-B62D-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <1074458181.24853.364.camel@delleric> <8CDD5CB2-4A08-11D8-81B2-000A95BA5A2C@o...> <p06010206bc31a291caf6@[192.168.254.4]> <008a01c3deaa$18e89c50$6403a8c0@ARIMATHEA>

On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 17:34, Jeff Rafter wrote:
> Does anyone know the current deployment/penetration level of RDDL? I know
> that I am using it for all of my major projects-- basically whenever
> anything goes public it has an RDDL document at the end of the namespace. I
> ask because I am curious what the cost is to upgrade.

I use it for all my major projects as well. Even if that doesn't make an
awful lot of vocabulary, I use it as I have shown in my examples (a
rddl:resource embedding a whole <div/> with often several links and even
if the upgrade would be feasible through a XSLT transformation, I
consider that it would decrease the expressiveness of the links.

Eric
-- 
Have you ever thought about unit testing XSLT templates?
                                                     http://xsltunit.org
Upcoming XML schema languages tutorial:
 - Santa Clara  -half day- (15/03/2004)        http://masl.to/?J24916E96
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric van der Vlist       http://xmlfr.org            http://dyomedea.com
(ISO) RELAX NG   ISBN:0-596-00421-4 http://oreilly.com/catalog/relax
(W3C) XML Schema ISBN:0-596-00252-1 http://oreilly.com/catalog/xmlschema
------------------------------------------------------------------------

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• References:
  • RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@d...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@o...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>
  • Re: RDDL(2): new version up
    • From: "Jeff Rafter" <lists@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by Date: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL(2): new version up
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread