[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
Miles Sabin wrote: > No great loss tho' (if Bill can cast his mind back that far he'd > probably remember that the API was a bit fiddly to work with) other > than as a proof of concept ... of which I'm sure there are others. No more fiddly than more widely used ones, as I recall ;) To be honest, the lexical stuff around attributes could go in a future version of XML without the (my) sky falling in - dual quote styles and unordered attributes, we could be shot of those right? Ignorable whitespace is another matter tho'. Bill de hÓra
|

Cart



