[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]


Miles Sabin wrote:

> No great loss tho' (if Bill can cast his mind back that far he'd 
> probably remember that the API was a bit fiddly to work with) other 
> than as a proof of concept ... of which I'm sure there are others.

No more fiddly than more widely used ones, as I recall ;)

To be honest, the lexical stuff around attributes could go in a 
future version of XML without the (my) sky falling in - dual quote 
styles and unordered attributes, we could be shot of those right? 
Ignorable whitespace is another matter tho'.

Bill de hÓra


Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member