Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
miles@m... (Miles Sabin) writes: >FWIW, I once put together a (somewhat over-elaborate) SAX-style API >which allowed for faithful lexical round-tripping as well as supporting >layering of SAX/DOM/Infoset/XPath APIs above it. I'm really glad to hear I'm not the only one working this direction! Is your work anywhere public, or buried in the mists of time? >I'd be surprised if I'm the only one who's done that and I have a hard >time comprehending what could possibly be supposed to prevent it. So, >yes ... of course you can have both. I've talked with people at conferences who've written pieces of the puzzle, largely in conjunction with Omnimark work, but I suspect there's a lot of this going on in small pieces. It'd be interesting to see what might happen if we could reach critical mass. -- Simon St.Laurent Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets Errors, errors, all fall down! http://simonstl.com -- http://monasticxml.org
|
