• To: "Miles Sabin" <miles@m...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
• From: "Dare Obasanjo" <dareo@m...>
• Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 10:39:06 -0800
• Thread-index: AcL4evQhAZN8wKf3TOeUnsMAShlnBwAAM0cn
• Thread-topic: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp

What infoset? The W3C XML Infoset recommendation describes comments as being significant but does not say anything about CDATA sections or entity boundaries (unless it is an unparsed entity) being preserved. 

________________________________

From: Miles Sabin [mailto:miles@m...]
Sent: Tue 4/1/2003 10:16 AM
To: xml-dev@l...
Subject: Re:  XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp




I don't really remember much of these discussions revolving around the
preservation or otherwise of lexical information, and where they did,
eg. CDATA sections, entity boundaries and comments, it stayed in ...
which IIRC is why they're in the Infoset and SAX2.

Cheers,


Miles

-----------------------------------------------------------------
The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org <http://www.xml.org>, an
initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org>

The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/

To subscribe or unsubscribe from this list use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.xml.org/ob/adm.pl>

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
    • From: Miles Sabin <miles@m...>

• Prev by Date: Re: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
• Next by Date: Re: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
• Previous by thread: Re: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
• Next by thread: Re: XML's Scylla and Charybdis - parse and regexp
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread