• To: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Subject: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• From: "J.Pietschmann" <j3322ptm@y...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:41:49 +0200
• Cc: 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• In-reply-to: <oproe3pqfgezizxn@s...>
• References: <001f01c30ea8$a5bda670$6401a8c0@tbp1> <002801c30e1b$b513b7a0$6401a8c0@pcukmka> <200304292356.h3TNu1902985@d...> <oproe3pqfgezizxn@s...>
• User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

Mike Champion wrote:
> TimBL's right, of course, but: a) there's  still no consensus  on what 
> dereferencing a namespace URI should produce;

Right, and brand new ideas crop up every few seconds, for example
look at (posted without consent of the author)
  http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=105155220305366&w=2
and some follow-ups.

J.Pietschmann

• References:
  • Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@c...>
  • RE: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: "Michael Kay" <michael.h.kay@n...>
  • Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
    • From: Joe English <jenglish@f...>
  • Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds tohalt?)
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by Date: Re: Setting dynamic block attributes.
• Previous by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by thread: Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread