• To: 'XML Dev' <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML1.1 grinds to halt?)
• From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 15:51:27 -0400
• In-reply-to: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCAEAAHDAA.julian.reschke@g...>
• References: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCAEAAHDAA.julian.reschke@g...>
• User-agent: Opera7.10/Win32 M2 build 2840

On Wed, 30 Apr 2003 21:41:22 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@g...> 
wrote:

>
>
> It seems that new ones (such as WordML) use http, while older ones (like
> vml, XDR datatyopes and some Office server extension stuff) use (broken)
> URNs.

OK, in light of that and Joshua's (enlighted AND informed) comment, I guess 
I stand corrected on this point.  Someone else noted that there is pushback 
on the use of URNs in the US Gov't XML guidelines, so people in both 
Washingtons may be more in tune with the mainstream W3C thinking on this 
than I thought.



 

• References:
  • RE: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
    • From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Setting dynamic block attributes.
• Next by Date: RE: (data) medium is the message
• Previous by thread: RE: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Next by thread: Re: Just say 'mu' to namespace URIs (was Re: XML 1.1 grinds to halt?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread