• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: and duh! Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:29:02 -0400
• References: <oprn3z6mj7ezizxn@localhost> <067e01c30c30$cf21acc0$b6f5d3ce@L565>

> ...  This processor might emit the following
> class:
> 
> <owl:Class rdf:ID="Foo">
>     <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Literal">
>         <ex:person rdf:resource="#Bill"/>
>         <ex:person rdf:resource="#Dave"/>
>         <ex:person rdf:resource="#Sue"/>
>         <ex:person rdf:resource="#Nancy"/>
>         <ex:person rdf:resource="#Freddy"/>
>     <owl:oneOf>
> </owl:Class>
> 
again, that should be:

... <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">

just in case anyone was actually paying attention...

Jonathan

• References:
  • Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: duh! Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Next by Date: Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Previous by thread: Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• Next by thread: Alternative for inline DTD in schema!
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread