• To: "XML DEV" <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: duh! Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>
• Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:27:37 -0400
• References: <3EA963E5.527F5F39@m...> <3EAAA9FA.64DEBA35@f...> <065901c30c2d$b9041520$b6f5d3ce@L565>

err, that's:
> 
> <owl:Class rdf:ID="DutiableItem">
>     <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Literal">
>         <owl:Thing
> rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/RogersOntology#camera"/>
>         ...
>     </owl:oneOf>
> </owl:Class>

<owl:Class rdf:ID="DutiableItem">
      <owl:oneOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
          <owl:Thing
  rdf:resource="http://www.example.org/RogersOntology#camera"/>
         ...
      </owl:oneOf>
  </owl:Class>

Jonathan

• References:
  • Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
    • From: "W. E. Perry" <wperry@f...>
  • Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jonathan@o...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Next by Date: and duh! Re: Statistical vs "semantic web" approaches to making sense of the Net
• Previous by thread: Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Next by thread: Re: Roger Costello: My Version of "Why use OWL?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread