[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
> [Danny Ayers] > > > You can also use RDF reification and old fashioned certainty factors to > > cross the bridge : > > > > [Nancy hasVirus #SARS] hasCertainty 0.01 > > > > Too bad that reified statements in RDF aren't the same as ordinary triples. > They are not necessarily asserted in the same way. Seems like this would > cause lots of problems for a reasoner. RDF reification is B.A.D. (Bray meaning). Avoid it. Use blank nodes instead. P.S. Tim, is "B.A.D." your invention, or did you see it elsewhere? I find myself using it a lot :-) -- Uche Ogbuji Fourthought, Inc. http://uche.ogbuji.net http://4Suite.org http://fourthought.com Gems From the [Python/XML] Archives - http://www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/04/09/py-xm l.html Introducing N-Triples - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/xml/library/x-thi nk17/index.html Use internal references in XML vocabularies - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerw orks/xml/library/x-tipvocab.html EXSLT by example - http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/x-exslt.html The worry about program wizards - http://www.adtmag.com/article.asp?id=7238 Use rdf:about and rdf:ID effectively in RDF/XML - http://www-106.ibm.com/develo perworks/xml/library/x-tiprdfai.html
|

Cart



