Re: more QName madness
Sorry to be dense, but I just don't see how having a scheme name registry will solve, or even ameliorate, the interoperable implementation of scheme semantics. At the end of the day, all we have is natural language documentation to define scheme semantics, and the obvious place to put such documentation is at the scheme namespace URI. Are you saying that scheme registration should _require_ scheme semantics documentation? ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format