Re: more QName madness
Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...> writes: > Well currently interop is not addressed, there is no way to get the > semantic of the XPointer from the namespaced scheme name. Surely that's not the point -- the point for interop is simply that any given application knows the names of the schemes it implements. Reasonable guarantees of uniqueness of scheme names, such as that provided by using URIs via QNames, are all that's required to prevent mistakes here. No-one _ever_ claimed that using QNames would mean that a general-purpose XPointer processor would be able to look up the scheme name and find some operationalisable description of scheme semantics. ht -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh W3C Fellow 1999--2002, part-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@c... URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format