|
[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message] Re: more QName madness
Daniel Veillard scripsit:
> s/blur/break/ as well as entities references which were here from the start,
> and the BASE in HTML breaks it too.
Not really; both of them are metadata-in-the-data kludges, based on the lack of a clean portable standardized freely adjustable metadata layer.
> If that URI-Reference also contains a fragment identifier, the semantic of
> that fragment identifier is said to be related to the Mime Type of the
> resource returned.
Yes, but that is about the referent, not about the document embedding the URI.
> Nothing in 4.1. Fragment Identifier seems to prevent
> the fragment ID to also depend on the enclosed document content, but maybe
> I didn't found the right sentence :-)
You might as well say that nothing seems to prevent the interpretation of
fragment IDs from depending on the phase of the moon. If they do, goodby
interop.
--
A mosquito cried out in his pain, John Cowan
"A chemist has poisoned my brain!" http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
The cause of his sorrow http://www.reutershealth.com
Was para-dichloro- jcowan@r...
Diphenyltrichloroethane. (aka DDT)
|
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced! Download The World's Best XML IDE!Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today! Subscribe in XML format
|
|||||||||

Cart








