• To: veillard@r...
• Subject: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 06:17:21 -0800
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• References: <E6CDEF4DFA31524D83641C6B9550AF77013FED36@e...> <20020318101838.N27396@r...>

Daniel Veillard wrote:
> 
>...
> 
>   There is also like 50 times more implementations. It also takes 50 times
> less CPU to process (a bit stretched but between jade and libxslt rendering
> of the same DocBook document there is a quantum gap, and yes this matters !)

There are way too many variables for you to declare that that has
anything to do with SGML versus XML parsing. One poor algorithm in
either DSSSL or XSLT could drag performance down that much.

 Paul Prescod

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• References:
  • SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@p...>
  • Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: RE: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by Date: RE: Re: XSLT and the 80/20 point (was RE: Tim Bray on " Which Technologies Matter?")
• Previous by thread: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by thread: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread