[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"

• To: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@p...>
• Subject: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>
• Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:18:38 -0500
• Cc: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E6CDEF4DFA31524D83641C6B9550AF77013FED36@e...>; from jens.jakob.andersen@p... on Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:45:00PM +0100
• References: <E6CDEF4DFA31524D83641C6B9550AF77013FED36@e...>
• Reply-to: veillard@r...
• User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 02:45:00PM +0100, Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI wrote:
> >Another turnaround - if XML matters and SGML doesn't, why 
> > haven't we seen the
> > >demise of SGML?
> 
> XML = eXtreme Marketing Language
> 
> XML is viewed as more sexy than SGML, but imho it is quite less sophisticated...

  There is also like 50 times more implementations. It also takes 50 times
less CPU to process (a bit stretched but between jade and libxslt rendering
of the same DocBook document there is a quantum gap, and yes this matters !)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@r...  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: Paul Prescod <paul@p...>
  • Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...>

• References:
  • SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by Date: Re: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Previous by thread: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by thread: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread