[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"

• To: veillard@r...
• Subject: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• From: Marcus Carr <mcarr@a...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:57:29 +1100
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• Organization: Allette Systems (Australia) Pty Ltd
• References: <E6CDEF4DFA31524D83641C6B9550AF77013FED36@e...> <20020318101838.N27396@r...>

Daniel Veillard wrote:

>   There is also like 50 times more implementations. It also takes 50 times
> less CPU to process (a bit stretched but between jade and libxslt rendering
> of the same DocBook document there is a quantum gap, and yes this matters !)

It matters if you process your data frequently - if you don't, it doesn't. SGML data
wasn't typically processed frequently anyway, so it's not much of a comparison to
start with, but even still, OmniMark was capable of howling through data at what might
still be regarded as an enviable rate.


--
Regards,

Marcus Carr                      email:  mcarr@a...
___________________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)      www:    http://www.allette.com.au
___________________________________________________________________
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
       - Einstein

• References:
  • SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: "Jens Jakob Andersen, PDI" <jens.jakob.andersen@p...>
  • Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: Daniel Veillard <veillard@r...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by Date: Re: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Previous by thread: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Next by thread: Re: SV: Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread