• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: Does XML-Dev matter?
• From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>
• Date: 19 Mar 2002 19:45:31 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.0.20020319174627.037c6f88@157.189.161.214>
• References: <72VPEC52C0626ZZ0VUE0QM2YOIIDC7.3c926d9d@MChamp> <5.1.0.14.0.20020319174627.037c6f88@157.189.161.214>

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 17:49, Jonathan Robie wrote:
> How well has the consensus on XML-Dev predicted whether a technology 
> matters in the commercial market? Do we have enough data to do a 
> retrospective? What were the surprises that were more successful than we 
> had expected? What were the wonderful technologies that simply didn't succeed?

Does the commercial market matter?

-- 
Simon St.Laurent
Ring around the content, a pocket full of brackets
Errors, errors, all fall down!
http://simonstl.com

• References:
  • Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Does XML-Dev matter?
    • From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>

• Prev by Date: RE: do leading indicators matter?
• Next by Date: RE: does the semantic web matter?
• Previous by thread: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Next by thread: Re: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread