• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Does XML-Dev matter?
• From: Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@s...>
• Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:49:27 -0500
• In-reply-to: <007a01c1cf8f$d53a1130$887ba8c0@mitchum>
• References: <72VPEC52C0626ZZ0VUE0QM2YOIIDC7.3c926d9d@MChamp>

How well has the consensus on XML-Dev predicted whether a technology 
matters in the commercial market? Do we have enough data to do a 
retrospective? What were the surprises that were more successful than we 
had expected? What were the wonderful technologies that simply didn't succeed?

Jonathan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Does XML-Dev matter?
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • Re: Does XML-Dev matter?
    • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@s...>

• References:
  • Tim Bray on "Which Technologies Matter?"
    • From: Mike Champion <mc@x...>
  • do leading indicators matter?
    • From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@e...>

• Prev by Date: Re: do leading indicators matter?
• Next by Date: RE: do leading indicators matter?
• Previous by thread: Re: do leading indicators matter?
• Next by thread: Re: Does XML-Dev matter?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread