• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matter?)
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 22:09:08 +1100
• References: <DC1124C4368AA9438D9DEC34ECB6F162013EB7B5@o...> <008d01c1d57a$60aafeb0$0e00a8c0@b...>

From: "James Clark" <jjc@j...>

> There would be no advantage in having Xerces-specific RELAX NG support.

I think Matthew means that Jing (or some other RELAX NG validator) should be 
contributed to Xerces with an XNI API so that everyone who uses Xerces gets it. 
I think that is an excellent idea.

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • RE: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matt er?)
    • From: Matthew Gertner <matthew.gertner@s...>
  • Re: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matter?)
    • From: "James Clark" <jjc@j...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matter?)
• Next by Date: RE: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matter?)
• Previous by thread: Re: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matter?)
• Next by thread: Re: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matt er?)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread