Re: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matter?)
> > RELAX NG does not require anything beyond what is provided by > > SAX and DOM, > > and can be cleanly layered on top of the parser. Xerces (or rather > > Xerces-J, which I assume is what you mean) supports SAX 2, > > and so works > > just fine with both Jing and MSV. There would be no advantage > > in having > > Xerces-specific RELAX NG support. > > Does this means that Xerces-J (yes, I meant the Java version) can validate > an instance against a RELAX NG schema? No, it means that existing RELAX NG validators in Java (i.e. MSV and Jing) can use Xerces-J as their XML parser just as well as they can use any other SAX2 parser. Xerces-J is an XML parser; RELAX NG validation is a completely separate process from XML parsing. James
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format