RE: RELAX NG Marketing (was RE: Do Names Matt er?)
> RELAX NG does not require anything beyond what is provided by > SAX and DOM, > and can be cleanly layered on top of the parser. Xerces (or rather > Xerces-J, which I assume is what you mean) supports SAX 2, > and so works > just fine with both Jing and MSV. There would be no advantage > in having > Xerces-specific RELAX NG support. Does this means that Xerces-J (yes, I meant the Java version) can validate an instance against a RELAX NG schema? I can't understand how this would be possible with just support for SAX and DOM; wouldn't the parser have to understand RELAX NG semantics? Matt
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format