• To: "'Leigh Dodds'" <ldodds@i...>, Lyndon J B Nixon <nixon@f...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: RE: RDDL and XSLT
• From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>
• Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2002 14:47:33 -0800

> From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@i...]

<snip/>

> I don't think Jonathan put this into the spec, but I notice that number of

> the examples in the spec (do a View Source) follow this guideline.

This approach is also described in the "Software-related purposes" doc [1],
which is referenced by the "well known purposes" doc, which is referenced by
the spec.

[1] http://www.openhealth.org/RDDL/purposes/software

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: RDDL and XSLT
    • From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>

• Prev by Date: RE: What happened to WAP
• Next by Date: Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserveits "X".)
• Previous by thread: RE: "There are six XLink elements" - True or False? Discuss
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL and XSLT
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread