Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserveits
[Leigh Dodds] > > This kind of design is quite similar to AFs, in fact, but its OOP orientation make it > > quite powerful (because polymorphism in data would be leveraged by polymorphism in code). > > This seems very close to AFs. In fact I think from a markup perspective the mechanisms > you need are *exactly* AFs > > What I think you're adding is a XML serialization/mapping layer which is AF aware. So > once you've processed your instance as a particular AF, you end up with application > objects that conform to interfaces that inherit from one another. Sounds nice. > > The dynamic proxy stuff in Java ought to make this kind of thing straight-forward to right. Is there a role for the "Demeter" method here? Cheers, Tom P
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format