[XML-DEV Mailing List Archive Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries] [Reply To This Message]

Re: Stupid Question (was RE: XML doesn't deserveits

Re:  Stupid Question (was RE:  XML doesn't deserveits
[Leigh Dodds]

> > This kind of design is quite similar to AFs, in fact, but its OOP
orientation make it
> > quite powerful (because polymorphism in data would be leveraged by
polymorphism in code).
> This seems very close to AFs. In fact I think from a markup perspective
the mechanisms
> you need are *exactly* AFs
> What I think you're adding is a XML serialization/mapping layer which is
AF aware. So
> once you've processed your instance as a particular AF, you end up with
> objects that conform to interfaces that inherit from one another. Sounds
> The dynamic proxy stuff in Java ought to make this kind of thing
straight-forward to right.

Is there a role for the "Demeter" method here?


Tom P


Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!

Buy Stylus Studio Now

Download The World's Best XML IDE!

Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!

Don't miss another message! Subscribe to this list today.
First Name
Last Name
Subscribe in XML format
RSS 2.0
Atom 0.3

Stylus Studio has published XML-DEV in RSS and ATOM formats, enabling users to easily subcribe to the list from their preferred news reader application.

Stylus Studio Sponsored Links are added links designed to provide related and additional information to the visitors of this website. they were not included by the author in the initial post. To view the content without the Sponsor Links please click here.

Site Map | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Trademarks
Free Stylus Studio XML Training:
W3C Member
Stylus Studio® and DataDirect XQuery ™are products from DataDirect Technologies, is a registered trademark of Progress Software Corporation, in the U.S. and other countries. © 2004-2013 All Rights Reserved.