• To: "Michael Brennan" <Michael_Brennan@A...>,"'Leigh Dodds'" <ldodds@i...>,"Lyndon J B Nixon" <nixon@f...>,<xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: RDDL and XSLT
• From: "Jonathan Borden" <jborden@a...>
• Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2002 01:46:33 -0500
• References: <D7155AD41ECFD511AF4A00B0D0202CB51DFEF9@MAILHOST>

Michael Brennan wrote:


> > From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@i...]
>
> <snip/>
>
> > I don't think Jonathan put this into the spec, but I notice that number
of
>
> > the examples in the spec (do a View Source) follow this guideline.
>
> This approach is also described in the "Software-related purposes" doc
[1],
> which is referenced by the "well known purposes" doc, which is referenced
by
> the spec.
>
> [1] http://www.openhealth.org/RDDL/purposes/software
>

Right. The way to name purposes and natures is outside the RDDL spec. The
"purposes" http://www.rddl.org/purposes and "natures"
http://www.rddl.org/natures documents describe conventions for using
purposes and natures. Note that I do not promise to keep the RDDL spec on
the openhealth.org server (and if I only knew how to configure my apache
virtual server correctly, there would be no trace of RDDL being on
openhealth.org at all ... oh well). In any case, use the
http://www.rddl.org/ prefix.

Jonathan

• References:
  • RE: RDDL and XSLT
    • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@A...>

• Prev by Date: Problem with noNameSpaceSchemaLocation
• Next by Date: Re: XLink and Validation
• Previous by thread: RE: RDDL and XSLT
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL and XSLT
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread