Re: RDDL and XSLT
Michael Brennan wrote: > > From: Leigh Dodds [mailto:ldodds@i...] > > <snip/> > > > I don't think Jonathan put this into the spec, but I notice that number of > > > the examples in the spec (do a View Source) follow this guideline. > > This approach is also described in the "Software-related purposes" doc , > which is referenced by the "well known purposes" doc, which is referenced by > the spec. > >  http://www.openhealth.org/RDDL/purposes/software > Right. The way to name purposes and natures is outside the RDDL spec. The "purposes" http://www.rddl.org/purposes and "natures" http://www.rddl.org/natures documents describe conventions for using purposes and natures. Note that I do not promise to keep the RDDL spec on the openhealth.org server (and if I only knew how to configure my apache virtual server correctly, there would be no trace of RDDL being on openhealth.org at all ... oh well). In any case, use the http://www.rddl.org/ prefix. Jonathan
PURCHASE STYLUS STUDIO ONLINE TODAY!
Purchasing Stylus Studio from our online shop is Easy, Secure and Value Priced!
Download The World's Best XML IDE!
Accelerate XML development with our award-winning XML IDE - Download a free trial today!
Subscribe in XML format