• To: cowan@m... (John Cowan)
• Subject: Re: Generality of HTTP
• From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 08:46:37 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <E16S6mo-0005IB-00@m...> from "John Cowan" at Jan 19, 2002 08:28:42 PM

> Mark Baker scripsit:
> 
> > Here's a challenge.  How many things can you name that can't be
> > identified with an HTTP URI, and moreover, can't have at least one
> > meaningful response to a GET?
> 
> Bricks, lots and lots of bricks.  They need brick: URIs.
> And when you GET them, you don't get much.

Not a problem for the mighty HTTP protocol and URI scheme;

http://www.markbaker.ca/2002/01/Bricks/

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.      mbaker@p...
http://www.markbaker.ca   http://www.planetfred.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: Generality of HTTP
    • From: "Miles Sabin" <msabin@i...>

• References:
  • Re: Generality of HTTP
    • From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• Next by Date: RE: Generality of HTTP
• Previous by thread: Re: Generality of HTTP
• Next by thread: RE: Generality of HTTP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread