• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: RE: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• From: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@g...>
• Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 11:57:37 +0100
• Importance: Normal
• In-reply-to: <097b01c1a14c$accb0fe0$2cd0a340@paultx>

> From: Paul T [mailto:pault12@p...]
> Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2002 1:52 AM
> To: Tim Bray; xml-dev@l...
> Subject: Re:  RDDL (was RE:  Negotiate Out The Noise)
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Tim Bray" <tbray@t...>
> 
> 
> > At 01:26 PM 18/01/02 -0800, Paul T wrote:
> > >And of course there is no information
> > >in RDDL paper itself. Heck, they did not even
> > >bother to provide a *single* example in their
> > >'specification'. Unbelievable bullshit. Can you
> > >think of any technical paper describing some
> > >syntax with not a single example?
> > 
> > Er Paul, go back and look a little closer. 
> 
> I tried several times. In the RDDL spec
> ( http://www.rddl.org ) there is no examples 
> on usage of RDDL syntax , like it was in the 
> artciles posted to this thread earlier. 

The RDDL spec *itself* is an example. Look at it's source code.

• References:
  • Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
    • From: Paul T <pault12@p...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re: Flexible Schemas (was RE: The task to be solved by RDDL)
• Next by Date: Re: Generality of HTTP
• Previous by thread: Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• Next by thread: Re: RDDL (was RE: Negotiate Out The Noise)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread