• To: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>
• Subject: Re: Generality of HTTP
• From: John Cowan <cowan@m...>
• Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:28:42 -0500 (EST)
• Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@t...>, Paul T <pault12@p...>, Jonathan Borden <jborden@m...>, xml-dev@l...
• In-reply-to: <200201192123.QAA05604@m...> from Mark Baker at "Jan 19,2002 04:23:08 pm"

Mark Baker scripsit:

> Here's a challenge.  How many things can you name that can't be
> identified with an HTTP URI, and moreover, can't have at least one
> meaningful response to a GET?

Bricks, lots and lots of bricks.  They need brick: URIs.
And when you GET them, you don't get much.

-- 
John Cowan           http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@c...
Please leave your values        |       Check your assumptions.  In fact,
   at the front desk.           |          check your assumptions at the door.
     --sign in Paris hotel      |            --Miles Vorkosigan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Generality of HTTP
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• References:
  • Generality of HTTP
    • From: Mark Baker <distobj@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: RDDL
• Next by Date: RDDL flame. Summary. ( Long, but the last one )
• Previous by thread: Re: Generality of HTTP
• Next by thread: Re: Generality of HTTP
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread