• To: <xml-dev@l...>
• Subject: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>
• Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 04:42:12 +1100
• References: <20020131160200.4732.qmail@w...>

 From: "Jim Ancona" <scarhill@y...>
 
> I believe I know the tool you're referring to. (I hope there aren't two of
> them!!) I reported this to them in a strongly worded bug about a year ago. It
> does seem to be fixed in their current release.
 
They are obviously just trying to be user-friendly in this: if your local name
is "schema" and your namespace does not match the ones they know about,
they tell you.  I think that is a fine default behaviour, but it should be defeatable.

Perhaps they just don't want to support Schematron ;-)   

Cheers
Rick Jelliffe

• References:
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Next by Date: Advice on parsing approach/tools?
• Previous by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread