• To: xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: Gavin Thomas Nicol <gtn@r...>
• Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 15:13:50 -0500
• In-reply-to: <5.1.0.14.2.20020130090533.01d83dc8@p...>
• Organization: Red Bridge Interactive, Inc.
• References: <3C56F1C3.50504@r...> <5.1.0.14.2.20020130090533.01d83dc8@p...>

On Wednesday 30 January 2002 04:09 am, Sean McGrath wrote:
> >[Gavin Thomas Nicol]
> >Yep. I still believe that local processing always wins. From a
> >practical perspective, the namespace prefix is usually a lot more
> >useful than the namespace itself.
>
> And its positively *scary* the number of apps out there in the real
> world that have wired the processing to the prefix - not the fully
> qualified name.

Should tell you something...

• References:
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: John Cowan <jcowan@r...>
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: Sean McGrath <sean.mcgrath@p...>

• Prev by Date: RE: RE: Auto-completion in editors
• Next by Date: Re: Prefixes / URIs consistency (was: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone)
• Previous by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread