• To: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...>, xml-dev@l...
• Subject: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• From: Jim Ancona <scarhill@y...>
• Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:02:00 -0800 (PST)
• In-reply-to: <009501c1a9f4$7c8c5310$4bc8a8c0@A...>
• Reply-to: jim@a...

--- Rick Jelliffe <ricko@a...> wrote:
> I cannot name the name because of potential commercial conflict,
> and because they may have fixed it now for all I know, 
> but there was a well-known XML tool which hardwired every "schema"
> element to be an XML Schema. This would not work with Schematron
> schemas, which also use that word for the document element's name.

I believe I know the tool you're referring to. (I hope there aren't two of
them!!) I reported this to them in a strongly worded bug about a year ago. It
does seem to be fixed in their current release.

Jim

=====
Jim Ancona
jim@a...                     jancona@x...

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Great stuff seeking new owners in Yahoo! Auctions! 
http://auctions.yahoo.com

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• References:
  • Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
    • From: "Rick Jelliffe" <ricko@a...>

• Prev by Date: Re: Feature suggestion: Hook property on Node
• Next by Date: Re: Co-operating with Architectural Forms
• Previous by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Next by thread: Re: There is a meaning, but it's not in the data alone
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread