• From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@i...>
• To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris.dimitriadis@i...>
• Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 11:41:43 -0500

Please elaborate a little on your definition of 
"corpoate owned identity on the net".  I can 
go tangential fast. :-) 

My view is that no company can both sell the 
software that handles the global registry and 
sell the service too.  That isn't a technical 
issue but something like saying a gun manufacturer 
can't field it's own army.  If the Hailstorm 
services depend on Microsoft owned servers, 
it's dead.  They aren't allowed to be a troll 
beneath the bridge.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Dimitris Dimitriadis [mailto:dimitris.dimitriadis@i...]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001 11:35 AM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Cc: XML DEV
Subject: SV: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm


While acknowledging your point, I'll allude to your first paragraph.

I'd like to see a discussion on corporate-owned identity on the net, which I
can't say I'm a big fan of.

Your views?

• Prev by Date: ANNOUNCE: enableNet Business Process Integrator V3.0 Freeware Edition
• Next by Date: Re: meta-specs (was RE: A few things I noticed about w3c's xml-sc hema)
• Previous by thread: SV: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm
• Next by thread: SV: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread