Cart
[Home] [By Thread] [By Date] [Recent Entries]
While acknowledging your point, I'll allude to your first paragraph. I'd like to see a discussion on corporate-owned identity on the net, which I can't say I'm a big fan of. Your views? /Dimitris -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: Bullard, Claude L (Len) [mailto:clbullar@i...] Skickat: den 1 juni 2001 18:09 Till: W. E. Perry Kopia: XML DEV Ämne: RE: Copyrighting schemas, Hailstorm It is always fascinating to read an article on how one takes control of identity, the Internet ontology, transactions etc, and at the bottom of the page is "(* You must be a member of the O'Reilly Network to use this feature.) Comment on this Article " Everyone wants to rule the world, or at least, the part they assert they own. And as far as I can tell, there is no realistic way around it unless some parts of the operation are public utilities. Does that mean the global registry services MUST be public utilities? In other words, MS or IBM or whomever is allowed to sell the software to create these but never allowed to own both? Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h ------------------------------------------------------------------ The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS <http://www.oasis-open.org> The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@l...
|
